TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke Railroad

N. T. Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke Railroad Co.

Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke R.R., 20 S.E. 962 (N.C. 1895)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 5, 1895
Judges
ClarK
Citations
20 S.E. 962116 N.C. 923
Headnotes
Par dice on Appeal — Settlement of O ase — Death of Judge. Where, on appeal, the ease and counter-ease were filed in time, but the trial Judge died before settling the case, the appellant, instead of a new trial being granted, may withdraw his ease and have the appeal tried on the counter-ease.
Summary
MotioN for writ of certiorari. .

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — ClarK

ClarK, J.:

The case oil appeal and counter-case were served in time and the trial judge was promptly requested to settle the case. At the call of the docket at last term, being the first term of this Court which was begun after the trial below, the appellant docketed the record proper and asked for a certiorari to bring up the case on appeal. Counsel consented however that the cause *924 might be continued to this term and that the “case on appeal” might be settled by the Judge at Nash Court, which was to be held by the Judge [Graves)

who had tried the cause. His Honor died before he could do so. The appellant would be entitled, nothing more appearing, to have the case remanded for a new trial, but the appellee expresses a desire to withdraw its counter-case and try the appeal upon appellant’s case. The appellant certainly has no ground to object to this.

Drake v. Connelly, 107 N. C., 463. The trial Judge having died, either the appellee or appellant might on motion withdraw the case or counter-case and the appeal will be heard upon the statement of the case on appeal made by the opposite party. In such cases the party intending to withdraw the case (or counter-case) properly should notify the opposite party in time, so that the case may be printed and stand regularly for trial at the first term. This was not .done in this instance, but that there may be no unnecessary delay the case is set for hearing at the end of the docket at this term.

Motion Allowed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1906: 11947: 119062026peak 1906 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge Railroad105 N.W. 958 (Iowa 1906)
  2. State v. Cannon42 S.E.2d 343 (N.C. 1947)

Most recent

  1. State v. Cannon42 S.E.2d 343 (N.C. 1947)
  2. Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge Railroad105 N.W. 958 (Iowa 1906)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Drake v. Connelly, 12 S.E. 251 (N.C. 1890) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list