TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Davis v. Yelton.

Davis v. . Yelton

Davis v. Yelton., 37 S.E. 464 (N.C. 1900)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 19, 1900
Judges
EatRouoth
Citations
37 S.E. 464127 N.C. 3481900 N.C. LEXIS 82
Headnotes
Specific Performance — Statute of Frauds — Parol Evidence —Sale of Land — Vendor and Purchaser — The Code, Sec. 155 p A parol contract to buy land can not be enforced, if the statute of frauds is pleaded.
Summary
Oivtt, AotioN by Albert Davis and Sally Rayfield against Charles and William Yelton, heard by Judge T. J. Shaw and a jury, at Eall Term, 1900, of Gaston Superior Court. Erom a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appealed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — EatRouoth

EatRouoth, O. J.

The plaintiff contracted in writing to sell and convey a tract of land to the defendant, who agreed verbally to pay $400 for the land at a day agreed on. Before the day, the defendant notified plaintiff, for reasons stated in his answer, that he declined to perform his promise. Plaintiff sues for specific performance, tenders his deed, and demands that defendant pay the purchase price. The defendant relies on and pleads the statute of frauds. Code, sec. 1554. The Court refused to admit parol evidence, and held that the plaintiff could not recover. No error.

Rice v. Carter, 33 N. C., 298 ;

Wade v. City of New Bern, 77 N. C., 460 ;

Gwathney v. Cason, 74 N. C., 5 . These decisions are approved and followed in numerous other cases.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1911: 11933: 119112026peak 1911 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Grantham v. Grantham171 S.E. 331 (N.C. 1933)
  2. Brown v. Hobbs70 S.E. 906 (N.C. 1911) · Concurrence

Most recent

  1. Grantham v. Grantham171 S.E. 331 (N.C. 1933)
  2. Brown v. Hobbs70 S.E. 906 (N.C. 1911) · Concurrence

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Wade v. City of Newbern, 77 N.C. 460 (1877) 12
Gwathney, Dey Co. v. Cason, 74 N.C. 5 (1876) 11
Rice v. Carter's Adm'r, 33 N.C. 298 (1850) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list