TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Roach.

State v. . Roach

State v. Roach., 3 N.C. 352 (1805)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of North Carolina · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 5, 1805
Judges
PER CURIAM:
Citations
3 N.C. 352
Summary
THIS was an indictment for passing counterfeit dollars, knowing them to be such. It was found in January term, 1805* The defendant pleaded to it, and it now stood for trial. The defendants counsel moved that it might be quashed, because there \vas no day stated on which the offence is supposed to have been committed, though the year is stated : there is a blank left in the indictment for the day and month. They said it was useless to proceed to trial, since the court must ate no judgment could be given upon a conviction: and they cited 2 Hawk. P. Crown, 25C. 259.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per curiam, after argument. — The defect which is pointed out,would be fatal upon a motion in arrest of judgement; and though it is true as has been argued, that the court has a discretion to quash or not, still it will quash where it is plain no judgment could be given in case oí a convienen: — Therefore let this indictment be quashed, but the defendant shad not be discharged, but must be bound over to another term to answer the charge.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list