Nance v. Welborne
D. R. Nance v. Olden Welborne.
Nance v. Welborne, 142 S.E. 477 (N.C. 1928)
Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.
A borrower employs an attorney and pays Mm $5.00 for preparing note and chattel mortgage and securing extension or renewal of a loan of $40.00 for 60 days. Does the payment of this fee to the borrower’s attorney amount to exaction of usury on the part of the lender who knew nothing of the arrangement between the borrower and his attorney? The question answers itself in the negative.
Speas v. Bank, 188 N. C., 524 , 125 S. E., 398 ;
Miller v. Dunn and Abdallah v. Dunn, 188 N. C., 397 , 124 S. E., 746 ;
Waters v. Garris, 188 N. C., 305 , 124 S. E., 334 .
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.