TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The Life Insurance Company of Virginia, Cross v. The Murray Investment Company and Murray Advisory Corporation, Cross

The LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross Appellee, v. the MURRAY INVESTMENT COMPANY and Murray Advisory Corporation, Defendants-Appellees Cross Appellants

The Life Ins. Co. of Va., Cross v. The Murray Inv. Co. & Murray Advisory Corp., Cross, 651 F.2d 1090 (5th Cir. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 29, 1981
Docket
No. 79-3266
Judges
Rubin, Garza, Suttle
Citations
651 F.2d 10901981 U.S. App. LEXIS 10983
Summary
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby GRANTED to the extent that upon remand of this case to the District Court for a determination of attorney’s fees, the District Court shall await the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in First National Bank in Weatherford, Texas v. Exxon Corporation, 597 S.W.2d 783 (Tex.Civ.App. — El Paso, 1980), writ granted, 24 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 375 (May 9,1981). If in its holding in that case the Texas Supreme Court definitively holds that attorney’s fees are not properly award-able under the circumstances of this case, the District Court shall not find or award attorney’s fees to the Life Insurance Company of Virginia. However, should the Supreme Court of Texas fail to hold contrary to this Court’s original opinion, the opinion shall remain as initially written. In all other respects the original opinion of this Court remains as written.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 11987: 11988: 11994: 119832026peak 1983 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Marshall v. Quinn-L Equities, Inc.704 F. Supp. 1384 (N.D. Tex. 1988)
  2. Preload Technology, Inc. v. A.B. & J. Construction Company, Inc.696 F.2d 1080 (5th Cir. 1983)
  3. Joe E. Wood v. Armco, Inc.814 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1987)
  4. Conway v. Saudi Arabian Oil Co.867 F. Supp. 539 (S.D. Tex. 1994)

Most recent

  1. Conway v. Saudi Arabian Oil Co.867 F. Supp. 539 (S.D. Tex. 1994)
  2. Marshall v. Quinn-L Equities, Inc.704 F. Supp. 1384 (N.D. Tex. 1988)
  3. Joe E. Wood v. Armco, Inc.814 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1987)
  4. Preload Technology, Inc. v. A.B. & J. Construction Company, Inc.696 F.2d 1080 (5th Cir. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
First Nat'l Bank in Weatherford v. Exxon Corp., 597 S.W.2d 783 (Tex. App. 1980) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list