TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Palmer v. Hood ex rel. Page Trust Co.

C. M. Palmer, J. H. Palmer, and M. v. Palmer, Trading and Doing Business as Palmer Stone Works v. Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, on Relation of Page Trust Company.

Palmer v. Hood ex rel. Page Trust Co., 175 S.E. 81 (N.C. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 20, 1934
Judges
Ouriam, Schenck
Citations
175 S.E. 81206 N.C. 8041934 N.C. LEXIS 313

Opinion of the Court — OuRiAM

Pee OuRiAM.

Is a general depositor of funds in a bank, hopelessly insolvent at the time of making such deposits, entitled to a preference in the liquidation of said bank?

Preferences are usually created by statute or arise from the application of the trust fund theory.

In re Bank, 204 N. C., 143 , 167 S. E., 561 . While there is abundant authority for the position asserted by the plaintiffs, this Court has consistently held that a general deposit such as disclosed by the present record, does not create a preference. Although there may be slight variations of fact, the case of Mfg. Co. v. Hood, 204 N. C., 349 , 168 S. E., 523 , and Mfg. Co. v. Hood, ante, 324, are determinative in principle.

Affirmed.

Schenck, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Beacon Mfg. Co. v. Hood, 168 S.E. 523 (N.C. 1933) 4
In re Bank, 167 S.E. 561 (N.C. 1933) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list