TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Allen v. Jordan.

Allen v. . Jordan

Allen v. Jordan., 3 N.C. 132 (1801)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of North Carolina · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 5, 1801
Judges
Taylor
Citations
3 N.C. 132
Summary
TORDAN had given a note for payment of money, to Allen * ** which note was taken by the brother of Allen as his agent: he had been requested by Allen to subscribe his name as a witness to the note, but neglected to do so at the time of the execution : He did so afterwards and at another day.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Taylor

Taylor, Judge This is a material alteration ©f the note : suppose it were given on a condition known to the first subscribing witness, and then a suit were commenced, and the second subscribing witness summoned for the plaintiff to prove it. He may not know any thing of the condition, being not the witness called by the parties to attest: of course he will prove the note and, and the plaintiff will recover, notwithstanding the com dition.

The jury however, found for the plaintiff; and Judge Taylor being moved for a new trial, refused it on the ground that the verdict was according to the equity of the case: the motion was opposed on the ground that this was a new trial, and that a second new trial should not be granted against two concurring verdicts.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list