Caldwell v. Wilson
L. C. Caldwell v. J. W. Wilson
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:
This case was tried below since the first day of the present (Term of this Court. If the appeal had not been docketed here till the call of causes from that District at the next Term of this Court, it would have been in time. Rule 5. But the same rule provides that it may be docketed at this Term and the Court has often held that if, by complying with the Statutory provisions as to time in settling cases, the appeal gets, here at this Term before the expiration of the time for docketing cases from that District, it stands regularly for argument at this term.
Avery v. Pritchard, 106 N. C., 344 , (at bottom of page 346);
Porter v. Railroad, Ibid, 478;
State v. Deyton, 110 N. C., 880 . Here, by observing the statutory regulations the appeal has gotten here after that District has been passed and hence is not entitled to be heard as a right, but being a case affecting the title to public office it comes within Rule 13, and the Court may set it down for argument. This was done under similar circumstances in HoughiaUing v. Taylor, at this Term, which involved the title to the office of County Commissioner and was set for hearing some weeks after the call of the District to which it belonged. Like the case before us, it was tried below after the beginning of the present Term of this (hurt.. The appellant’s case on appeal was accepted by the appellee on November 22 and filed in the Clerk’s office that day.
The Code, Section 551, then makes it the duty of the Clerk to send up the transcript within twenty days (State v. Deyton, 119 N. C., 880 ) though in civil cases he is not required to do so unless his fees therefor are paid, (Bailey v. Broun, 105 N. C., 127 ;
State v. Nash, 109 N. C., 822 ); but, if the Clerk sends it up at once instead of taking the whole *425 twenty days, or does not stand on bis right to exact bis cost in advance, the appellant cannot- complain and the case is regularly here.
The motion-of appellant to put the case off the docket has therefore neither merit nor precedent to sustain it, and in view of the importance of the caso to the public the appellee’s motion is granted and it will stand for argument on Saturday, December 4. If the call of causes from the 10th District has not then been closed, this case will be called on the Monday following.
' Motion allowed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.