Russell v. Boone
T. C. Russell and C. W. Russell, Trading as Denton Marble Works v. W. E. Boone, B. I. Harrison, L. E. Workman, Milba Hill, A. A. Anderson, C. C. Chandler, J. M. Daniel, Sr., B. E. Morris, L. C. Wood, A. A. Hill, and Wilson Hill.
Opinion of the Court
Pee Cubiam.
Tbe following were tbe issues submitted to tbe jury, and tbe answers thereto:
“1. Did tbe defendants, or either of them, negligently fail to perform their duties as directors of tbe Bank of Denton, as alleged in tbe complaint; and, if so, which ones? Answer: ‘Yes.’
“2. If so, did tbe plaintiffs sustain damage thereby, as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: ‘Yes.’
“3. What amount are tbe plaintiffs entitled to recover? Answer: ‘$824.39.’ ”
We have examined tbe record, exceptions, assignments of error, and able briefs of tbe attorneys, and can find no prejudicial or reversible error.
Tbe cause was tried out on tbe principle laid down in Houston v. Thornton, 122 N. C., p. 365.
We can find No error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.