Neal v. MacE
Nancy Neal v. John MacE.
Headnotes
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Merrimon, J.
It does not appear in the record that any case has been settled upon appeal for this court, nor are errors assigned in the record. Upon examination, we find that the court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of the action. In such a case the judgment will be affirmed.
Swepson v. Clayton, 74 N. C., 551 ;
Bryant v. Fisher, 85 N. C., (369;
McDaniel v. Pollock, 87 N. C., 503 . Judgment affirmed. Let this be certified.
No error. Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.