Pritchard v. Baxter

Griffin Pritchard v. O. F. Baxter.

Pritchard v. Baxter, 12 S.E. 906 (N.C. 1891)

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided: February 5, 1891
Judges: <italic>Per Curiam:</italic>
Citations: 12 S.E. 906108 N.C. 129

Cited by 5

Headnotes

Appeal — Injunction.

Summary

This was a Motion to continue a restraining order in an action pending in Pasquotank Superior Court, heard at Chambers, in Washington, N 0., on June 18th, 1889, before Brown, J. An affidavit (supported by certified copy of issues, etc.) was filed in this Court, to the effect that a judgment had been rendered in this case against the plaintiff upon issues found by a jury, and that no appeal was taken, and the trial was had since the order made in the injunction proceeding.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Cnriam:

It appears from a transcript from the Court-below, that since the issuing of this injunction, all of the-issues have been tried and found against the appellant, and that a judgment accordingly has been rendered, finally disposing of the action. It thus appears that the appellant had no ground whatever for suing out the injunction, and there-being only the costs involved, it is adjudicated that the appeal be dismissed.

Dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →

State Highest Courts5

Relies on it most ⓘ

In re Kaeppler75 N.W. 253 (N.D. 1898)
State ex rel. Herring v. Pugh34 S.E. 538 (N.C. 1899)
Pearson v. Quinn166 S.W. 746 (Ark. 1914)
Cole v. Taylor132 Tenn. 92 (1915)
Russell v. Campbell17 S.E. 149 (N.C. 1893)

Most recent

Cole v. Taylor132 Tenn. 92 (1915)
Pearson v. Quinn166 S.W. 746 (Ark. 1914)
State ex rel. Herring v. Pugh34 S.E. 538 (N.C. 1899)
In re Kaeppler75 N.W. 253 (N.D. 1898)
Russell v. Campbell17 S.E. 149 (N.C. 1893)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list