Tiedemann v. Tiedemann
Katherine C. Tiedemann v. Herbert A. Tiedemann.
Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The facts found by the judge are set out in his order. These facts are sufficient to support the order. There was evidence at the hearing tending to sustain the findings of fact. The amounts which the defendant is required to pay for the reasonable subsistence of plaintiff, pendente lite, and for compensation to her counsel were determined by the judge in the exercise of his sound discretion. They are not subject to review by this Court.
Anderson v. Anderson, 183 N. C., 139 , 110 S. E., 863 . They may be modified at any time before the trial of the action upon the application of either party. C. S., 1667. The order is Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.