TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Galloway v. Stone

G. G. GALLOWAY and Wife, Et Al., v. I. D. STONE and C. L. SMITH

Galloway v. Stone, 182 S.E. 333 (N.C. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 20, 1935
Judges
Devin
Citations
182 S.E. 333208 N.C. 7391935 N.C. LEXIS 116

Opinion of the Court — Devin

Devin, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether a permanent injunction was proper. Defendants concede that the facts found by the court below are sufficient to justify a continuance to the hearing, but they maintain they are entitled to a day in court to determine in some proper way the issues raised by the pleadings; and in this we concur.

A j>ermanent or perpetual injunction issues as a final judgment which settles the rights of the parties, after the determination of all issues raised. McIntosh N. C. Prac. & Proc., secs. 848, 849;

Abernethy v. Burns, 206 N. C., 370 .

This disposition of the appeal renders unnecessary a discussion of the other questions presented on the argument and by brief.

Error and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11957: 11959: 11960: 12009: 119362026peak 1936 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gilbert v. North Carolina State Bar678 S.E.2d 602 (N.C. 2009)
  2. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION v. Davis116 S.E.2d 792 (N.C. 1960)
  3. Cauble v. Bell107 S.E.2d 557 (N.C. 1959)
  4. State ex rel. Thompson v. District Court313 P.2d 1034 (Mont. 1957)
  5. Tomlinson v. Cranor184 S.E. 554 (N.C. 1936)

Most recent

  1. Gilbert v. North Carolina State Bar678 S.E.2d 602 (N.C. 2009)
  2. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION v. Davis116 S.E.2d 792 (N.C. 1960)
  3. Cauble v. Bell107 S.E.2d 557 (N.C. 1959)
  4. State ex rel. Thompson v. District Court313 P.2d 1034 (Mont. 1957)
  5. Tomlinson v. Cranor184 S.E. 554 (N.C. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Abernethy v. Burns, 173 S.E. 899 (N.C. 1934) 23

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list