TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wood v. Citizens Bank

JULIEN WOOD Et Al. v. THE CITIZENS BANK, Administrator, Et Al.

Wood v. Citizens Bank, 154 S.E. 623 (N.C. 1930)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 10, 1930
Judges
Stacy
Citations
154 S.E. 623199 N.C. 3711930 N.C. LEXIS 120

Opinion of the Court — Stacy

*373 Stacy, C. J.

On tbe findings of tbe referee, approved by tbe trial court, wbi'cb are conclusive as tbey are not challenged for want of evidence to support them, we have discovered no exceptive assignment of error of sufficient merit to work a reversal of tbe judgment.

Tbe two circumstances which differentiate this ease from those cited and relied upon by appellant are, first, the fact that tbe $10,265.00 in question was embezzled from tbe bank by tbe deceased treasurer, and, second, tbe finding that said funds were used by tbe treasurer in bis capacity as such to discharge county obligations.

It is well settled that where one’s property has been purloined by actionable fraud or covin, tbe law permits him to follow it and to recover it from tbe wrongdoer, or from any one to whom it has been transferred otherwise than in good faith and for a valuable consideration, so long as it can be identified or traced; and tbe principle applies to money and cboses in action as well as to specific property.

Proctor v. Fertilizer Co., 189 N. C., 243 , 126 S. E., 608 ;

Mfg. Co. v. Summers, 143 N. C., 102 , 55 S. E., 522 ;

Edwards v. Culberson, 111 N. C., 342 , 16 S. E., 233 . Tbe pursuit of equity in this respect is stopped only when tbe means of ascertainment fail, or tbe rights of bona fide purchasers for value, without notice, intervene.

McNinch v. Trust Co., 183 N. C., 33 , 110 S. E., 663 .

Had tbe referee found that what "Ward did with respect to tbe bank’s funds amounted to a loan, a different question would have been presented.

Liles v. Rogers, 113 N. C., 197 , 18 S. E., 104 ;

Bank v. South Hadley, 128 Mass., 503 ;

Bank v. New Castle, 224 Pa., 285 ;

Pittsburgh v. Bank, 79 Atl. (Pa.), 406.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1931: 11932: 21934: 11938: 11943: 21945: 11954: 219312026peak 1932 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. King v. Richardson136 F.2d 849 (4th Cir. 1943)
  2. Wyatt v. Sharp80 S.E.2d 762 (N.C. 1954)
  3. Beaver v. Crawford Paint Co.82 S.E.2d 113 (N.C. 1954)
  4. Ex Parte Michie165 S.E. 359 (S.C. 1932)
  5. State ex rel. Underwood v. Watson27 S.E.2d 144 (N.C. 1943)
  6. Wilson v. Robinson32 S.E.2d 601 (N.C. 1945)

Most recent

  1. Beaver v. Crawford Paint Co.82 S.E.2d 113 (N.C. 1954)
  2. Wyatt v. Sharp80 S.E.2d 762 (N.C. 1954)
  3. Wilson v. Robinson32 S.E.2d 601 (N.C. 1945)
  4. State ex rel. Underwood v. Watson27 S.E.2d 144 (N.C. 1943)
  5. King v. Richardson136 F.2d 849 (4th Cir. 1943)
  6. Bright v. Hood, Comr. of Banks199 S.E. 630 (N.C. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
Liles v. Rogers, 18 S.E. 104 (N.C. 1893) 31
Mfg. Co. v. Summers, 55 S.E. 522 (N.C. 1906) 27
Edwards v. Culberson, 16 S.E. 233 (N.C. 1892) 24
Proctor v. Carolina Fertilizer & Phosphate Co., 126 S.E. 608 (N.C. 1925) 7
Agawam Nat'l Bank v. Inhabitants of South Hadley, 128 Mass. 503 (1880) 32
McNinch v. Trust Co., 110 S.E. 663 (N.C. 1922) 17
First Nat'l Bank v. New Castle, 73 A. 331 (Pa. 1909) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list