Brawley v. Turner
Brawley & Gantt v. Theodore Turner
Brawley v. Turner, 94 S.E. 1053 (N.C. 1917)
Headnotes
Contracts — Quantum Meruit.
No .error is foiind in tbis action to recover upon a quantum meruit for tbe value of services rendered in procuring a pardon.
Summary
Appeal by defendant from Kerr, J., at the March Term, 1917, of DURHAM.
This is an action to recover the value of services rendered in procuring a pardon for the defendant.
There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendant appealed.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
We have carefully examined the record and find no error. The rulings upon evidence, considered in connection with the caution given to the jury, were clearly right, and the whole controversy resolved itself into an issue of fact for the jury.
The plaintiffs first alleged a special contract to pay them $500, but abandoned this cause of action and recovered $350 on a quantum meruit.
No error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.