TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hardison v. W. H. Hampton & Son

George W. Hardison, Employee v. W. H. Hampton and Son, Employer, and Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, of London, England, Carrier.

Hardison v. W. H. Hampton & Son, 165 S.E. 355 (N.C. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 21, 1932
Judges
Connor
Citations
165 S.E. 355203 N.C. 1871932 N.C. LEXIS 343

Opinion of the Court — O'Connor

Connor, J.

There is no provision in the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act requiring an injured employee to file a claim for compensation for his injury with the North Carolina Industrial Commission. The injured employee is required by section 22 of the act to give notice to his employer of the accident which resulted in his injury. Thereafter, the employer is required to report the accident and claim of the employee for compensation to the Commission on form 19, as prescribed by the Commission. No settlement of the claim can be made by the employer and the employee without the approval of the Commission. Section 18. If they fail to reach an agreement in regard to the compensation to which the injured employee is entitled, then either party may make application to the Commission for a hearing in regard to the matters at issue, and for a ruling thereon. Section 57. When the em *189 ployer bas filed with, the Commission a report of the accident and claim of the injured employee, the Commission has jurisdiction of the matter, and the claim is filed with the Commission within the meaning of section 24.

In the instant case, the claim of the injured employee was filed with the Industrial Commission within one year after the accident, and for that reason the employee was not barred of his right to compensation. There is no error in the judgment. It is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1936: 21937: 21939: 11948: 11949: 11971: 11982: 12007: 119362026peak 1936 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Perdue v. Daniel International, Inc.296 S.E.2d 845 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982)
  2. Whitted v. Palmer-Bee Co.46 S.E.2d 109 (N.C. 1948)
  3. Smith v. Allied Exterminators, Inc.180 S.E.2d 390 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971)
  4. Bye v. Interstate Granite Co.53 S.E.2d 274 (N.C. 1949)
  5. Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller653 S.E.2d 400 (N.C. 2007)
  6. Winslow v. Carolina Conference Association191 S.E. 403 (N.C. 1937)

Most recent

  1. Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller653 S.E.2d 400 (N.C. 2007)
  2. Perdue v. Daniel International, Inc.296 S.E.2d 845 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982)
  3. Smith v. Allied Exterminators, Inc.180 S.E.2d 390 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971)
  4. Bye v. Interstate Granite Co.53 S.E.2d 274 (N.C. 1949)
  5. Whitted v. Palmer-Bee Co.46 S.E.2d 109 (N.C. 1948)
  6. Thompson v. Virginia & Carolina Southern Railroad6 S.E.2d 38 (N.C. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list