Arrington v. Arrington.
Arrington v. . Arrington
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
We gather from tbe manuscript argument filed in tbis Court by tbe plaintiff, in person, tbat ber object in desiring a reinstatement of tbe cause is to reopen tbe same and bave another reference. Tbe case came before tbis Court at February Term, 1894 (114 N. 0., 151), and upon exceptions to tbe report of tbe referee. In an elaborate opinion by Shepherd, O. J., all tbe matters in controversy were decided and “tbe case remanded in order tbat judgments may be entered in accordance with the opinion of tbis Court.” The' record of tbe ease since then is not before us, but we assume as a matter of course tbat such final judgments bave long since been entered.
There was nothing presented to Judge Ward, or in tbe papers sent here on tbis appeal from bis order, which discloses a necessity for a further reference or for reinstating tbe case on tbe docket of the Superior Court. Tbe order of bis Honor in tbe Superior Court is Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.