TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Russell v. Campbell

[Fn] W. H. Russell v. John Campbell.

Russell v. Campbell, 17 S.E. 149 (N.C. 1893)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 5, 1893
Judges
Clark
Citations
17 S.E. 149112 N.C. 404
Headnotes
Appeal, dismissal of — Disposal of Subject-matter. Where, after an appeal from the refusal of judgment for the restitution of personal property-, the appellant has- come into possession of the property, or its equivalent, this Court will not hear the matter merely to adjudicate the costs, but will dismiss the appeal.
Summary
Action of CLAIM AND DELIVERY by plaintiff to recover possession of an engine. Defendant replevied, and .plaintiff and his servants proceeded to remove the property (the defendant being present and objecting), and sold and delivered it to a purchaser in Robeson county. At May Term, 1892, of CUMBERLAND Superior Court the defendant moved for an order requiring plaintiff to return the property forthwith to defendant. His Honor, Boykin, J., refused to grant the same, and defendant appealed. Upon the call of the case in this Court it appeared from statement of counsel that the matter had been settled, “ and that no rights of parties would be affected by the determination of this case, and that the only matter involved is the costs of the action.” Plaintiff’s counsel moved to dismiss.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Clark

Clark, J.

: This was an appeal from the refusal of a judgment for the restitution of certain personal property. Since the appeal was taken the appellant has come into possession of the property, or its equivalent. The Court *405 will not hear a matter merely to adjudicate the costs when the subject-matter of the apppeal has been disposed of.

State v. Railroad, 74 N. C., 287 ;

Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N. C., 93 ;

Pritchard v. Baxter, 108 N. C., 129 .

Appeal Dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1895: 11898: 11899: 11902: 11914: 11917: 11945: 11969: 118952026peak 1895 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Benvenue Parent-Teacher Ass'n v. Nash County Board of Education170 S.E.2d 473 (N.C. 1969)
  2. In re Kaeppler75 N.W. 253 (N.D. 1898)
  3. Cochran v. Rowe36 S.E.2d 75 (N.C. 1945)
  4. State v. Lambert43 S.E. 176 (W. Va. 1902)
  5. Elliott v. Tyson23 S.E. 102 (N.C. 1895)
  6. State ex rel. Herring v. Pugh34 S.E. 538 (N.C. 1899)

Most recent

  1. Benvenue Parent-Teacher Ass'n v. Nash County Board of Education170 S.E.2d 473 (N.C. 1969)
  2. Cochran v. Rowe36 S.E.2d 75 (N.C. 1945)
  3. VanDyke v. Ætna Life Insurance93 S.E. 444 (N.C. 1917)
  4. Pearson v. Quinn166 S.W. 746 (Ark. 1914)
  5. State v. Lambert43 S.E. 176 (W. Va. 1902)
  6. State ex rel. Herring v. Pugh34 S.E. 538 (N.C. 1899)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N.C. 93 (1883) 9
State v. Richmond & Danville R.R., 74 N.C. 287 (1876) 8
Pritchard v. Baxter, 12 S.E. 906 (N.C. 1891) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list