TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Custody of Albertson

In Re Custody of James Leslie Albertson.

In re Custody of Albertson, 178 S.E. 231 (N.C. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 28, 1935
Judges
Claricson, Staot
Citations
178 S.E. 231207 N.C. 5531935 N.C. LEXIS 203

Opinion of the Court — ClaricsoN

ClaricsoN, J.

This proceeding concerns a writ of habeas corpus instituted by Grace H. Albertson for the custody of James Leslie Albert-son, infant son, about 8 years of age, of Grace H. and W.

H. Albertson. The matter bas heretofore been before this Court.

In re Albertson, 205 N. C., 742 .

The brief of petitioner appellant says: “The appellant concedes that if the judgment of the High Point municipal court is a valid judgment, the petitioner must seek her remedy by a motion in the cause in the municipal court of the city of High Point, In re Blake, 184 N. C., 278 . But if the said judgment is a void judgment, it can have no effect whatsoever upon the petitioner’s rights, and habeas corpus will lie to determine the custody of the child.” See In re Albertson, supra.

This proceeding is governed by the action of Grace Hulin Albertson v. W.

H. Albertson, ante, 547.

The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

Staot, C. J., dissents.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1936: 11949: 21959: 11960: 31962: 11965: 12006: 119362026peak 1960 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Thomas v. Motor Lines52 S.E.2d 377 (N.C. 1949)
  2. Shoe v. Hood112 S.E.2d 543 (N.C. 1960)
  3. Powell v. DEIFELLS, INCORPORATED112 S.E.2d 56 (N.C. 1960)
  4. Davis v. Jessup125 S.E.2d 440 (N.C. 1962)
  5. Green ex rel. Green v. Green185 S.E. 651 (N.C. 1936)
  6. Green v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.139 S.E.2d 538 (N.C. 1965)

Most recent

  1. Greer v. Greer624 S.E.2d 423 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006)
  2. Green v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.139 S.E.2d 538 (N.C. 1965)
  3. Davis v. Jessup125 S.E.2d 440 (N.C. 1962)
  4. Shoe v. Hood112 S.E.2d 543 (N.C. 1960)
  5. Fisher ex rel. Fisher v. Rogers112 S.E.2d 76 (N.C. 1960)
  6. Powell v. DEIFELLS, INCORPORATED112 S.E.2d 56 (N.C. 1960)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
In re Albertson, 172 S.E. 411 (N.C. 1934) 10
In re Blake, 114 S.E. 300 (N.C. 1922) 19

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list