State v. Mathis
The State v. Captain Mathis
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
*816 MerrimoN, C. J.:
The appellant prisoner was convicted at Spring Term, 1891, of Wilkes Superior Court, Bynum, J., presiding, of the crime of murder and there was judgment of death against him, from which he appealed to this Court. Pending the appeal, and before it was reached in its order to be heard and determined, the Governor commuted his sentence of death to imprisonment for life in the penitentiary. The prisoner accepted such commutation, and in pursuance of the same lie is now imprisoned in the penitentiary. When the appeal was called in its order to be heard, the prisoner presented and exhibited before the Court the order of commutation of his sentence duly made and signed by the Governor, and signified his acceptance of the same, and prayed the Court that he be allowed freely to abandon his appeal, and that the Court take no further notice of or action in and about the same.
The Attorney General admitted the commutation of the prisoner’s sentence and his acceptance of the same, and made no objection thereto, and prayed the Court to make such disposition of the appeal as it might deem proper.
Alter the prisoner was convicted, the Governor had power and authority to commute the sentence of death against him to the lesser 'punishment of imprisonment for life in the penitentiary. Const. Art. 3, §6;
The Code, §1096. The appeal did not, as formerly, vacate the judgment of death pending the appeal. It remained in full force to be executed, unless the Court should adjudge there was error therein. The statute (Acts 1887, ch. 191) so express^ provides, and hence no question such as that very seriously considered in State v. Alexander, 76 N. C., 231 , arises here.
It certainly appears to the Court that the Governor has granted such commutation of the prisoner’s sentence; that the latter has accepted the same, and is now undergoing punishment in the penitentiary in pursuance of law in such *817 cases. There is, therefore, no reáson why he shall not be allowed to abandon his appeal. His application must be granted and the appeal dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.