TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Nowell v. Royal Cotton Mills

J. H. Nowell v. Royal Cotton Mills.

Nowell v. Royal Cotton Mills, 69 S.E. 129 (N.C. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 26, 1910
Judges
Oubiam
Citations
69 S.E. 129153 N.C. 3221910 N.C. LEXIS 76
Headnotes
Negligence — Evidence—Nonsuit. Motion to nonsuit properly overruled in tbis case, there being sufficient evidence of negligence to take the case to the jury.
Summary
Appeal by defendant from O. II. Allen, J., at the April Term, 1910, of Waile.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Oubiam

Peb Oubiam.

The Court is of opinion that the testimony of the plaintiff himself was amply sufficient to justify the court below in submitting the issue of negligence to the jury, notwithstanding the contradicting evidence of defendant, however strong, and therefore the motion to nonsuit was properly overruled.

We have examined the several exceptions to the evidence and charge of the court and are of opinion that no substantial error has been committed of sufficient importance to warrant us in ordering a new trial.

We therefore hold there is no reversible error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list