TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Eubanks

In Re George C. Eubanks.

In re Eubanks, 162 S.E. 769 (N.C. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 9, 1932
Judges
Stacy
Citations
162 S.E. 769202 N.C. 3571932 N.C. LEXIS 503
Cited by 6

Opinion of the Court — Stacy

Stacy, C. J.

The petitioner is not asking to have his matrimonial status declared, as was the case in Baumann v. Baumann, 250 N. Y., 382 , nor his legitimacy established, as appeared in Beresford v. Attorney-General, L. R. (1918) Prob., 33, note 12 A. L. R., 86. See, also, note, 68 A. L. R., 129. He seeks only to have his racial status determined in an ex parte proceeding with no contradicter present. Primarily, his purpose partakes of a social matter rather than a legal controversy.

The proceeding is not within the scope or purview of the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, chap. 102, Public Laws 1931.

Poore v. Poore, 201 N. C., 791 , 161 S. E., 532 .

Proceeding dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1936: 11940: 11949: 11957: 11966: 11974: 119362026peak 1936 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lide v. Mears56 S.E.2d 404 (N.C. 1949)
  2. Taos County Board of Education v. Sedillo101 P.2d 1027 (N.M. 1940)
  3. Angell v. City of Raleigh148 S.E.2d 233 (N.C. 1966)
  4. Duke v. State ex rel. Shaw100 S.E.2d 506 (N.C. 1957)
  5. North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.206 S.E.2d 178 (N.C. 1974)
  6. Allison v. Sharp184 S.E. 27 (N.C. 1936)

Most recent

  1. North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.206 S.E.2d 178 (N.C. 1974)
  2. Angell v. City of Raleigh148 S.E.2d 233 (N.C. 1966)
  3. Duke v. State ex rel. Shaw100 S.E.2d 506 (N.C. 1957)
  4. Lide v. Mears56 S.E.2d 404 (N.C. 1949)
  5. Taos County Board of Education v. Sedillo101 P.2d 1027 (N.M. 1940)
  6. Allison v. Sharp184 S.E. 27 (N.C. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Poore v. Poore, 161 S.E. 532 (N.C. 1931) 52
Baumann v. Baumann, 165 N.E. 819 (N.Y. 1929) 98

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list