Pritchard v. Panacea Spring Co.
Mrs. M. J. PRITCHARD, in Her Own Right and as Administratrix, Et Als. v. THE PANACEA SPRING COMPANY Et Als.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Hoke, J.
This was an action to wind up an insolvent corporation, or one threatened with insplvency, and make distribution of the assets. A receiver was duly appointed to preserve the property pending litigation, and the cause was referred to ascertain and declare the indebtedness and determine the amount and priority of certain liens, etc. The referee having 'made report, exceptions were filed, and on the hearing the court overruled some of the exceptions, sustained others, in whole or in part, and entered judgment modifying the report accordingly and making distribution of a large part of the assets, according to the rights of the parties as established by the judgment. The judgment then concludes as follows: “Upon motion of Gay & Midyette, attorneys for excepting creditors, it is ordered that, as to the claim of Royall & Borden, the cause is recommitted to T. T. Hicks, Esq., referee, to hear such further evidence as the parties may offer thereon, and to make his further findings of facts and conclusions of law thereon in respect of said claims to the next term .of this court.”
In this condition of the record, and on the facts indicated, the Court is of opinion that the appeal has been prematurely taken and that the same must be dismissed without prejudice. It has *250 been the uniform ruling of this Court that when a reference has been entered upon, it must proceed to its proper conclusion; and that an appeal will only lie from a final judgment or one in its nature final.
Brown v. Nimocks, 126 N. C., p. 808;
Driller Co. v. Worth, 117 N. C., p. 515, and Haley v. Gray, 93 N. C., p. 195.
If a departure from this procedure is allowed in one case, it could be insisted upon in another, and each claimant, conceiving himself aggrieved, could bring the cause here for consideration, and litigation of this character would be indefinitely prolonged, costs unduly enhanced and the seemly and proper disposi'ion of causes prevented. Under the authorities cited, the appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
Appeal dismissed.
Clark, O. J., did not sit.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.