Roberts v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus Co.
A. P. ROBERTS v. GREENSBORO-FAYETTEVILLE BUS COMPANY Et Al.
Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J., after stating the case: The order striking the defendants’ purported statement of case on appeal from the file of the papers in the cause is supported by the decision in Hicks v. Westbrook, 121 N. C., 131 , 28 S. E., 188 . This, however, did not entitle the plaintiff to a dismissal of the appeal.
Wallace v. Salisbury, 147 N. C., 58 , 60 S. E., 713 .
Non constat, an examination of the defendants’ purported statement of case on appeal, filed here with application for certiorari, fails to convince us that, on the defendants’ own showing, reversible error was committed on the trial of the cause. Hence, it further appearing that no error exists on the face of the record proper, the judgment will be affirmed.
McNeill v. R. R., 117 N. C., 642 , 23 S. E., 268 . It would seem, therefore, that, irrespective of the procedural questions raised by the appeal, the same result would have followed, had the case been presented without them.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 14 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.