TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Southerland v. Crump

C. S. SOUTHERLAND v. W. T. CRUMP, Executor of J. A. Southerland, Deceased

Southerland v. Crump, 142 S.E. 7 (N.C. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 14, 1928
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
142 S.E. 7195 N.C. 8561928 N.C. LEXIS 228

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Conceding that there was some evidence tending to sustain plaintiff’s allegation of an express contract by which defendant’s testator agreed to pay plaintiff for services to be rendered to him by plaintiff, there was no error in the judgment dismissing the action, at the close of all the evidence, under 0. S., 567. There was no evidence tending to show performance by plaintiff of the alleged contract.

In the absence of such evidence, plaintiff cannot recover in this action. The judgment is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 119302026peak 1930 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Southerland v. Crump153 S.E. 845 (N.C. 1930)

Most recent

  1. Southerland v. Crump153 S.E. 845 (N.C. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list