TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Tomlinson

State v. Wiley Tomlinsons.

State v. Tomlinson, 77 N.C. 528 (1877)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 5, 1877
Judges
FAIRCLOTH, J.
Citations
77 N.C. 528

Opinion of the Court

The defendants, Wiley, Frank, John, and Buck Tomlinson, were indicted as follows:

"The jurors, etc., present, that (defendants) did . . . unlawfully and willfully fell trees and place obstructions in the mill-race below the mill of one C. F. Finch, the same being a natural passage for water, but not navigable for flats or rafts, whereby the natural flow of water through said mill-race was retarded, contrary," etc. Upon motion of defendants' counsel, his Honor quashed the bill of indictment, and Moore, solicitor for the State, appealed. *Page 377 The bill of indictment cannot be held to embrace the offense denounced in Bat. Rev., ch. 32, sec. 110, which provides against obstructions to the modes of furnishing water for the operation of mills, etc., because by its express terms the obstruction is located "in the millrace below the mill." It was no doubt drawn in view of section 154 of said chapter, but it is fatally defective under that section, inasmuch as it fails to aver that said obstructions were not put in the race "for the purpose of utilizing water as a motive power," or words of the same import. "If there be any exception contained in the same clause of the act which creates the offense, the indictment must show negatively that the defendant, or the subject of the indictment, does not come within the exception." Archbold Cr. Pl., 25; S. v. Norman , 13 N.C. 222 .

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: S. v. Narrows Island Club , 100 N.C. 482 ; S. v. Turner , 106 N.C. 694 ; S. v. Poole, ib. , 700; S. v. Downs , 116 N.C. 1067 ; S. v. Newcomb , 126 N.C. 1106 ; S. v. Yoder , 132 N.C. 1118 ; S. v. Hicks , 143 N.C. 694 .

(530)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1881–1882: 11899–1900: 11903–1904: 118812026peak 1881 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Stokes54 Vt. 179 (1881)
  2. State v. Yoder.44 S.E. 689 (N.C. 1903) · Dissent
  3. State v. Newcomb36 S.E. 147 (N.C. 1900)

Most recent

  1. State v. Yoder.44 S.E. 689 (N.C. 1903) · Dissent
  2. State v. Newcomb36 S.E. 147 (N.C. 1900)
  3. State v. Stokes54 Vt. 179 (1881)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Downs, 21 S.E. 689 (N.C. 1895) 25
State v. Norman, 13 N.C. 222 (1829) 23
State v. Narrows Island Club., 5 S.E. 411 (N.C. 1888) 18
State v. Hicks, 57 S.E. 441 (N.C. 1907) 14
State v. Turner, 10 S.E. 1026 (N.C. 1890) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list