Meredith v. Kent's

Meredith v. Kent's Ex'rs. &8212 1 Mart., 28.

Meredith v. Kent's, 1 N.C. 52 (1792)

Court: Superior Court of North Carolina · State Appellate Courts
Decided: October 5, 1792
Judges: But McCOY, J., declared it to be the settled practice to admit the deposition absolutely; as by the residence of the witness in another State, there could be no forfeiture for nonattendance, though summoned.
Citations: 1 N.C. 52

Cited by 0

Opinion of the Court

Objected by Lowther , for the plaintiff, who opposed the introduction of the testimony totis viribus , upon the ground that this was not the best evidence; as the witness might have been and was actually summoned in the cause, whilst in the State. Cited: Kinzey v. King , 28 N.C. 78 ; Stern v. Herren , 101 N.C. 519 ; State v. Means , 175 N.C. 823 . *Page 58

(53)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Stern & Co. v. Herren, 8 S.E. 221 (N.C. 1888)	2

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list