United States v. Martin J. Phillippi
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin J. PHILLIPPI, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was charged in Count 2 of the indictment with a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 113(c) in that he assaulted another with a dangerous weapon to do bodily harm. He allegedly placed a large knife at the throat of Lynn Peters and cut her neck. The jury found defendant guilty on Count 2 and acquitted defendant on Count 1, in which he was charged with kidnapping.
The only issue on appeal is whether an indictment charging assault with a dangerous weapon under 18 U.S.C. § 113 (c) is defective when it fails to allege that the defendant committed the assault without just cause or excuse.
The Magistrate in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss Count 2 relied on an earlier decision by Judge Gordon, who presided at this trial, in U. S. v. Peters, 476 F.Supp. 259 (E.D.Wis.1979). In Peters Judge Gordon decided that the prosecution was not obliged to include a reference to “just cause or excuse” in the indictment.
Id.
at 262 .
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Hockenberry v. U. S., 442 F.2d 171, 173 (1970), decided that it was not necessary to recite in the indictment that the assault was “without just cause or excuse.”
We agree with the Ninth Circuit in Hock-enberry and with Judge Gordon in Peters .
The judgment of conviction on Count 2 is therefore affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.