Plott v. Western North Carolina Railroad
R.C. Plott v. the Western North Carolina Railroad Company.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Eeade, J.
The plaintiff was not obliged to pursue the-remedy prescribed in the defendant’s charter to recover damages for the way over his land, to-wit: assessment by commissioners within two years from the time the road was located, because the defendant dispensed with it, and assured the plaintiff that it would be settled without. And the plaintiff may recover upon that special promise.
The promise was in the summer or fall, 1858, and the action was commenced in 1869, and the statute of limitations, three years, is pleaded. The plea cannot avail, because, on 11th May, 1861, before the lapse of three years from the promise, the Legislature passed an act suspending the statute of limitations, and a series of statutes since then have kept the statute of limitations suspended up to 1st January,. 1870.
Johnson v. Winslow, 63 N. C. Rep. p. 552.
No error.
Pee Cdbiam. Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.