TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bank v. Clark

State v. Clark McNeil.

Bank v. Clark, 8 N.C. 36 (1820)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 5, 1820
Judges
TAYLOR, C. J.
Citations
8 N.C. 36

Opinion of the Court

The acceptance and payment of a check is prima facie evidence that the plaintiffs had in deposit money of the defendants wherewith to pay it; and if the fact were not so it is incumbent upon the plaintiffs to prove by the (37) state of the accounts that the defendants have overdrawn. But that cannot be shown by the books of the bank, which is only a private corporation, and they are inadmissible in favor of the plaintiffs. The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Cited: Fox v. Horah , 36 N.C. 360 ; Bland v. Warren , 65 N.C. 374 ; Durham v. R. R. , 108 N.C. 402 ; Dyeing v. Hosiery Co. , 126 N.C. 294 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Fox v. Horah, 36 N.C. 358 (1841) 11
Durham Dyeing Co. v. Golden Belt Hosiery Co., 35 S.E. 586 (N.C. 1900) 2
Roseman v. Pless, 65 N.C. 374 (1871) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list