TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Morris

State v. Lester Morris.

State v. Morris, 81 S.E. 462 (N.C. 1914)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 28, 1914
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
81 S.E. 462166 N.C. 4411914 N.C. LEXIS 465
Headnotes
Convicts — Guards—Right to Whip — County Commissioners — Rules and Regulations. In tbe-absence of rules aud regulations made and promulgated by tbe county,commissioners permitting it; a guard bas no legal right or authorhy to whip convicts in bis care or custody. 8. v. Nipper, ante, 272, cited as controlling.
Summary
xYppeal by defendant from. Adams, J'., at January Term, 1914, of GastoN. Tbe defendant, a superintendent of one of tbe cbain-gangs in Gaston County, was convicted of whipping a convict. Tbe whipping, with a leather strap l1/^ inches wide, 16 or 18 inches long, attached to a wooden handle 10 or 12 inches long, was admitted by the defendant, and the evidence for the State showed a serious beating and the use of a stick. There were no written rules or regulations, and there is no evidence that the commissioners of Gaston County have formulated and adopted any rules or regulations for the discipline of convicts. His Honor charged the jury that if they believed the evidence the defendant was guilty, and he excepted and appealed from the judgment imposing a fine of $10.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decision of this appeal is controlled by S. v. Nipper, ante, 272.

There was a difference of opinion among the members of the Court upon some of the questions raised in that case; but all agreed that guards 'have no right to whip the convicts in the absence of rules and regulations by the county commissioners, and none appear here.

No error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Revis136 S.E. 346 (N.C. 1927)

Most recent

  1. State v. Revis136 S.E. 346 (N.C. 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list