TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Adams

The State v. Johnson Adams and Hagar Reeves

State v. Adams, 65 N.C. 537 (1871)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 5, 1871
Judges
Boyden
Citations
65 N.C. 537
Headnotes
It is not fornication and adultery where persons, who were formerly slaves, were married during the existence of slavery according to the forms then prevailing, and after their emancipation continued to cohabit together in the relation of husband and wife. The act of 1865 — ’66, chap. 40, sec. 5, requiring such parties to go before the County Court Clerk, or a Justice of the Peace, and tó acknowledge the fact of such cohabitation and the time of its commencement, makes it a misdemeanor onhj for failure to perform these duties.
Summary
Indictment for fornication and adultery tried before Cloud, J., at Spring Term, 1871, of Surry Superior Court. The jury found a special verdict that the defendants were formerly slaves and were married in 1864, according to the custom which then prevailed among slaves, and from that time commenced cohabiting together, passing, and recognizing each other as man and wife, which continued up to the finding of this indictment. They further find that defendants have never complied with the provisions of the acts of assembly of March 10th, 1866, and March 4th, 1867. His Honor, upon the foregoing verdict gave judgment for the defendants from which the Solicitor for the State appealed. --, for defendants.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Boyden

Boyden, J.

The act of 1866, ch. 40, see. 5, enacts: “That in all cases where men and women, both, or one of whom were lately slaves, and are now emancipated, now cohabit together in the relation of husband and wife, the parties shall be deemed to have been lawfully married, as man and wife, at the time of the commencement of such cohabitation, although they may not have been married' in due form of law.”

This act, to all intents and purposes, rendered the parties thus cohabiting, man and wife, and devolved upon each of the parties the duties and responsibilities of the marriage state. It is true, that this same 5th section also imposes upon all persons, whose cohabitation has been thus ratified into a state of marriage, “ the duty of going before the Clerk of the Court of Pleas and Quarter Session, at his office, or before some Justice of the Peace, and to acknowledge the fact of such cohabitation, and the time of its commencement,” and a failure to perform this duty, is made an indictable misdemeanor; but the failure to perform this duty cannot avoid the marriage thus ratified by the act of 1866.

There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1880–1881: 11882–1883: 11884–1885: 11888–1889: 11890–1891: 11896–1897: 11904–1905: 11912–1913: 11926–1927: 11956–1957: 118802026peak 1880 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wadsworth v. Brigham266 P. 875 (Or. 1927)
  2. Long v. Barnes87 N.C. 329 (1882)
  3. State v. Melton26 S.E. 933 (N.C. 1897)
  4. Daniel v. Sams17 Fla. 487 (1880)
  5. Kelley v. Kelley310 P.2d 328 (Or. 1957)
  6. Bettis v. Avery.52 S.E. 584 (N.C. 1905)

Most recent

  1. Kelley v. Kelley310 P.2d 328 (Or. 1957)
  2. Wadsworth v. Brigham266 P. 875 (Or. 1927)
  3. Merrick v. Betts101 N.E. 131 (Mass. 1913)
  4. Bettis v. Avery.52 S.E. 584 (N.C. 1905)
  5. State v. Melton26 S.E. 933 (N.C. 1897)
  6. Jones v. Hoggard12 S.E. 907 (N.C. 1891)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list