State v. Horne
State v. John L. Horne.
Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.
The appeal questions the constitutionality of chapter 18!), Private Laws 1925, which confers certain additional jurisdiction in criminal matters on the mayor’s court of the town of Farmville, Pitt County. The legislation is assailed by the defendant on the ground that it is in violation of Art. II, sec. 29 of the State Constitution, which provides: “The General Assembly shall not pass any local, private or special act or resolution relating to the establishment of courts inferior to the Superior Court,” etc. There is nothing in this section of the Constitution which prohibits the Legislature from increasing or decreasing the jurisdiction of these inferior courts already in existence. The prohibition is against the establishment of courts inferior to the Superior *376 Court, by any local, private or special act or resolution. This was tbe bolding in Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N. C., 9 , and on authority of that case, tbe present ruling must be upheld.
Tbe only other exception appearing on the record has been covered by prior adjudications, and it needs no elaboration.
S. v. Abernethy, 190 N. C., 768 ;
S. v. Stallings, 189 N. C., 104 .
No error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.