TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Osborne ex rel. Osborne v. Bundy

Cecil Osborne, by His Next Friend, D. E. Osborne v. C. v. Bundy.

Osborne ex rel. Osborne v. Bundy, 127 S.E. 516 (N.C. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 15, 1925
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
127 S.E. 516189 N.C. 8371925 N.C. LEXIS 422

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe defendant is engaged in tbe mercantile business at Oakdale Cotton Mills and operates a Ford car for tbe delivery of packages, and is sued for personal injury alleged to bave been caused by tbe negligence of bis driver. An inspection of tbe record reveals no sufficient evidence of actionable negligence, and for tbis reason tbe judgment is , Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1953: 119532026peak 1953 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hunt ex rel. Hunt v. Wooten76 S.E.2d 326 (N.C. 1953)

Most recent

  1. Hunt ex rel. Hunt v. Wooten76 S.E.2d 326 (N.C. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list