TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

J. H. Allen & Co. v. Styer

J. H. ALLEN & COMPANY, Appellant, v. C. E. STYER, Catherine Styer, Mary F. Regan and Ida E. Gallock, Respondents

J. H. Allen & Co. v. Styer, 199 N.W. 447 (N.D. 1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
North Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 12, 1924
Judges
Bronson, Birdzell, Nuessle, Christianson, Johnson
Citations
199 N.W. 44751 N.D. 1571924 N.D. LEXIS 156

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The facts and issues in this case being identical with those in the companion case of Finch, Van Slyke & McConville v. *158 Styer, ante, 148, 199 N. W. 444 , this case is controlled by that decision. The judgment is affirmed.

Bronson, Oh. J., and Birdzell, Nuessle, Christianson, and Johnson, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gamble-Robinson Minot Co. v. Mauratis214 N.W. 913 (N.D. 1927)

Most recent

  1. Gamble-Robinson Minot Co. v. Mauratis214 N.W. 913 (N.D. 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Finch, Van Slyke & McConville v. Styer, 199 N.W. 444 (N.D. 1924) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list