TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Diamond

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, Appellant, v. HERMAN H. DIAMOND and David Levich, Respondents

State v. Diamond, 219 N.W. 834 (N.D. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
North Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 1, 1928
Judges
Nuessle, Burke, Birdzell, Christianson, Burr
Citations
219 N.W. 83456 N.D. 8601928 N.D. LEXIS 208

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

It is stipulated that this case is controlled by the determination of the issues in the case of State v. Isaak Diamond, ante, 854, 219 N. W. 831 , argued at this term. The information is based on the same statute, there was a demurrer which was sustained, and an appeal from the order. On the strength of the holding in the case of the State v. Isaak Diamond the decision of the county court is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Nuessle, Oh. J., and Burke, Birdzell, Christianson, and Burr, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Diamond, 219 N.W. 831 (N.D. 1928) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list