Joint Council Of Teamsters No. 42 v. Associated General Contractors Of California, Inc.
Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, of America and General Teamsters and Food Processing Local No. 87, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. The Building Industry Association of California, Inc. The Engineering Contractors Association, Inc. And the Southern California Contractors Association, Inc.
Opinion
662 F.2d 531 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3238 , 93 Lab.Cas. P 13,229 , 2 Employee Benefits Ca 2243
JOINT COUNCIL OF TEAMSTERS NO. 42, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, of America; and General Teamsters and Food Processing Local No. 87, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; The Building Industry Association of California, Inc.; The Engineering Contractors Association, Inc.; and The Southern California Contractors Association, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 80-5869.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1981. Decided Oct. 1, 1981.
George A. Pappy, Pappy, Kaplon & Vogel, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
John H. Stephens, Cox, Castle & Nicholson, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Mariana R. Pfaelzer, District Judge, Presiding.
Before ELY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and COPPLE, * District judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
The issues here involved were thoroughly considered by District Judge Pfaelzer in the court below. Essentially upon the basis of Judge Pfaelzer's Opinion, reported at 520 F.Supp. 3 (C.D.Cal.1981), the District Court's judgment is 2
AFFIRMED.
* The Honorable William P. Copple, United States District Judge, District of Arizona, sitting by designation
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.