TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Meeks v. State

Meeks, Appellant, v. the State of Ohio, Appellee

Meeks v. State, 220 N.E.2d 378 (Ohio Ct. App. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 9, 1966
Docket
No. 220
Judges
Guernsey, Younger, Middleton
Citations
220 N.E.2d 3788 Ohio App. 2d 837 Ohio Op. 2d 41966 Ohio App. LEXIS 364

Opinion of the Court — Guernsey

Guernsey, J.

In a proceeding to vacate sentence initiated under the provisions of Section 2953.21, Revised Code, the Common Pleas Court entered final judgment adverse to the petitioner on April 2,1966. Notice of appeal therefrom was filed 21 days thereafter, on April 23,1966. The timeliness of the filing of the notice is now in issue.

The enactment, effective July 21, 1965, of Sections 2953.21 et seq., Revised Code, created a special proceeding for a post-conviction determination of whether the constitutional rights of a prisoner in custody were denied or infringed prior to the conviction. The right of appeal from a final judgment in a postconviction proceeding is conferred by Section 2953.23, Revised Code, and specifically prescribed as being “pursuant to Chapter 2505 of the Revised Code.” The time limits set forth in Section 2953.05, Revised Code, for filing notice of appeal are not applicable for that section is not a part of Chapter 2505 and the limits therein set forth have reference to other types of judgments or orders. Compare, State v. Thomas, 175 Ohio St. 563 . Nor is there any provision for appeal by leave of court.

The time for filing a notice of appeal is, therefore, governed *9 solely by Section 2505.07, Revised Code, prescribing that tbe appeal shall be perfected, by filing notice of appeal, within 20 days after the journal entry of the judgment appealed from has been filed with the clerk for journalization. This is a mandatory time limit, and a Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal where the notice of appeal has not been filed within this prescribed period. See Volz v. Volz, 167 Ohio St. 141 , and authorities cited therein.

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, and the notice of appeal and other documents which appellant has filed are ordered stricken from the files.

Appeal dismissed.

Younger, P. J., and Middleton, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1987: 119872026peak 1987 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Robert Cobb v. E.P. Perini832 F.2d 342 (6th Cir. 1987)

Most recent

  1. Robert Cobb v. E.P. Perini832 F.2d 342 (6th Cir. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list