G. A. Boeckling Co. v. Slattery
The G.A. Boeckling Co. v. Slattery.
Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, J.
May Slattery brought an action in the Erie Common Pleas against the G. A. Boeckling Co. to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while she was a visitor upon the pleasure resort grounds of Boeckling by reason of being hit by a baseball which was thrown by some unknown person, at a concession operated by one E. D. Forbes.
Boeckling had leased to Forbes a concession which consisted of a ball throwing device. There were no protecting screens on the sides of same, the space outside of the portion leased remaining under the control of Boeck-ling. Upon trial of the case in the court below, a verdict of $5000 was returned for Slat-tery and this is a proceeding in error to reverse the lower court.
The Court of Appeals held:
1. Slattery came upon the grounds by invitation, and at the time of the injury the grounds were under the control of Boeckling who owed her the duty of ordinary care to render the premises reasonably safe for invitees. Baseball Co. v. Eno, 112 OS. 175 .
2. The case was properly one in which the question of the negligence of the company, proximate cause, and contributory negligence were for the jury, the verdict was not manifestly against the weight of the evidence, and court below submitted the issues to the jury in a charge which was free from prejudicial error.
3. The verdict is not excessive a s Slattery has an injury of a permanent nature and was forced to give up remunerative employment.
Judgment affirmed.
(Richards & Lloyd, JJ., concur.)
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.