United States v. John M. Haydel, Jr.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John M. HAYDEL, Jr., A/K/A “Ice Cream” and “Mugsy”, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion July 8, 5 Cir., 1981, 649 F.2d 1152 ).
Before SKELTON ** , Senior Judge, RUBIN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The opinion is corrected so that the last paragraph before Part I of the opinion reads as follows:
“Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, five of the remaining counts were dismissed. Haydel stipulated that his trial on four counts would be to the court on the stipulated testimony of five U.S. Special Agents and certain exhibits listed on a stipulated exhibit list, subject to the objections previously raised by Haydel and his motions to suppress. Sitting without a jury, the district court found that Haydel had made a material understatement of his income and that he was guilty of all four counts of violating the applicable tax statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (1). Haydel was sentenced to one year on the first count and five years of probation on the remaining three counts.”
With this correction, the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge of this Administrative Unit in regular active service having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 16; Fifth Circuit Judicial Council Resolution of January 14, 1981), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 21 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.