TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lenhart v. Toledo Urology Associates, Inc.

Lenhart, Appellants, v. Toledo Urology Associates, Inc., Appellee

Lenhart v. Toledo Urology Associates, Inc., 356 N.E.2d 749 (Ohio Ct. App. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 21, 1975
Docket
No. L-75-117
Judges
Brown, Stephenson, Collbb
Citations
356 N.E.2d 74948 Ohio App. 2d 2492 Ohio Op. 3d 2001975 Ohio App. LEXIS 5896

Opinion of the Court — Brown

Brown, P. J.

Plaintiffs, the ..appellants herein, filed a complaint charging medical inalpractide against defendants Westhovbn,' Link,' Lutton and Hotchkiss, physicians and surgeons, and.: against their professional association, defendant Toledo Urology Associates, Inc., the appellee herein. Plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment of the. trial court dismissing appellee from .this action for failure of plaintiffs to.state a.claim upon which relief could be granted. This judgment, resulted from a motion to dismiss filed by 'fihé defendant corporation. The final judgment recited, pursuant to Civ. R. 54(B), that “there was no just reason for delay.”

Ohio laws permit, groups of professionals to form professional associations. R. C., 1785.02. This type of.'business Organization 'has been recognized for some.tinxe i.h Other states.

Group Health Assn.

v. Moor (D.C.Cir. 1938), *250 24 F. Supp. 445 ;

Complete Service Bureau v. San Diego County Med. Soc.

(1954), 43 Cal. 2d 201 , 272 P. 2d 497 ;

State Electro-Medical Institute v. State (1905), 74 Neb. 40 , 103 N. W. 1078 .

In Ohio, the professional association organized under R. C. Chapter 1785 should be regarded as a corporation.

O’Neill v. United States (N. D. Ohio 1968), 14 Ohio Misc. 61 , 281 F. Supp. 359 , affirmed 410 F. 2d 888 .

The Committee on Professional Ethics of the American Bar Association noted that the characteristics of a professional association are: “(1) limited liability; (2) centralized management; (3) continuity of life; (4) free transferability of interests.” See, The New Ohio Professional Associations Act and the Preclusion of Corporations from the Practice of Law, 24 Ohio St. L. J. 685, 689 (1963).

A medical association has the same general liability features as a general corporation. R. C. 1785.08; Smith, Professional Corporations in Ohio:

The Time for Statutory Revision, 30 Ohio St. L. J. 439, 448-450 (1969); Vesely, The Ohio Professional Association Law, 13 Western Reserve L. R. 195, 203 (1962).

Corporations may be held liable for the negligent acts of physicians. 42 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 649, Physicians and Surgeons, Section 128;

Cooper v. Sisters of Charity (1971), 27 Ohio St. 2d 242, 254 ;

Avellone v. St. John’s Hospital (1956), 165 Ohio St. 467 .

The second issue set forth in plaintiffs’ brief, concerning a dismissal of the defendant Professional Association, construed as an assignment of error is, therefore, well taken. The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for fui'ther proceedings according to law.

Judgment reversed.

StepheNsoN and Collbb, JJ., concur.

Stephewson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, and Coller, J., retired, of the Court of Common Pleas of Wood County and assigned to active duty under authority of Section 6(C); Article IV, Constitution, designated to sit in the Sixth Appellate District.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 11983: 11987: 12006: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sloan v. Metropolitan Health Council of Indianapolis, Inc.516 N.E.2d 1104 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987)
  2. Birt v. St. Mary Mercy Hospital of Gary, Inc.370 N.E.2d 379 (Ind. Ct. App. 1977)
  3. Reiner v. Kelley457 N.E.2d 946 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983)
  4. Skolnick v. Cincinnati Ins. Cos., Unpublished Decision (3-24-2006)2006 Ohio 1461 (2006)

Most recent

  1. Skolnick v. Cincinnati Ins. Cos., Unpublished Decision (3-24-2006)2006 Ohio 1461 (2006)
  2. Sloan v. Metropolitan Health Council of Indianapolis, Inc.516 N.E.2d 1104 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987)
  3. Reiner v. Kelley457 N.E.2d 946 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983)
  4. Birt v. St. Mary Mercy Hospital of Gary, Inc.370 N.E.2d 379 (Ind. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
O'Neill v. United States, 281 F. Supp. 359 (N.D. Ohio 1968) 24
Complete Serv. Bureau v. San Diego Cnty. Med. Soc'y, 272 P.2d 497 (Cal. 1954) 18
State Electro-Med. Inst. v. State, 103 N.W. 1078 (Neb. 1905) 14
Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc., 272 N.E.2d 97 (Ohio 1971) 153
O'Neill v. United States, 410 F.2d 888 (6th Cir. 1969) 31
Group Health Ass'n v. Moor, 24 F. Supp. 445 (D.D.C. 1938) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list