TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sylvester v. Sylvester

Sylvester, Appellee, v. Sylvester, Appellant

Sylvester v. Sylvester, 254 N.E.2d 699 (Ohio Ct. App. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 6, 1969
Docket
No. 10908
Judges
Hildebrant, Shannon, Hess
Citations
254 N.E.2d 69921 Ohio App. 2d 5850 Ohio Op. 2d 1041969 Ohio App. LEXIS 466

Opinion of the Court — HildebraNt

HildebraNt, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, Hamilton County, granting a divorce and other relief to the plaintiff, appellee herein. Defendant’s only assignment of error is that the lower court erred, to his prejudice, in ordering him to support the two minor children beyond the age of twenty-one years. The decree provided as follows:

“It is further ordered that defendant pay the sum of twenty-five ($25.00) dollars per week for each of the two (2) minor children of the parties, being a total of fifty ($50.00) dollars per week until either child is emancipated by age of twenty-one (21) or until graduated from college, whichever occurs later. Said amount, plus one per cent (1%) poundage is to be paid through the Hamilton County Clerk of Courts.”

On the authority of Miller v. Miller, 154 Ohio St. 530 , paragraph two of the syllabus, which states, “In a divorce action, where a child of the parties attains his majority, authority of the court over such child comes to an end, and the court is without power to provide for the support *59 of or aid to such, child or to continue a provision for his support. * * this court will modify the judgment of the court below by substituting for the decree above quoted the following decree:

It is further ordered that defendant pay the sum of twenty-five ($25.00) dollars per week for each of the two (2) minor children of the parties, being a total of fifty ($50.00) dollars per week until either child reaches the age of twenty-one (21) years, or is otherwise emancipated. Said amount, plus one per cent (1%) poundage is to be paid through the Hamilton County Clerk of Courts.

Judgment accordingly.

SHANNON, P. J., and Hess, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1984: 12000: 119842026peak 1984 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bardes v. Todd746 N.E.2d 229 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
  2. Verplatse v. Verplatse477 N.E.2d 648 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984)

Most recent

  1. Bardes v. Todd746 N.E.2d 229 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
  2. Verplatse v. Verplatse477 N.E.2d 648 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Miller v. Miller, 97 N.E.2d 213 (Ohio 1951) 37

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list