State ex rel. Ford v. City of Toledo
The State, Ex Rel. Ford, Appellant, v. City of Toledo Et Al., Appellees
Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Counsel for the relator does not question the right of the chief of police to suspend a member of the police department but predicates his claim that the proceedings were void and unlawful upon the asserted invalidity of the designation of the commissioner of inspection or deputy director of *387 safety as director of public safety and the 'unconstitutionality of the charter provisions relating to appeals to the civil service commission.
The Court of Appeals was correct in concluding that the action below was one merely to recover salary accruing during the time of suspension and that the petition did not state a cause of action for invoking the extraordinary writ of mandamus.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Turner, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.