TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Oliver v. Evatt

Oliver, Appellant, v. Evatt, Tax Commr., Et Al., Appellees

Oliver v. Evatt, 58 N.E.2d 381 (Ohio 1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 6, 1944
Docket
No. 30091
Judges
Weygandt, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner
Citations
58 N.E.2d 381144 Ohio St. 231144 Ohio St. (N.S.) 23129 Ohio Op. 3901944 Ohio LEXIS 356

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

On August 14, 1943, appellant filed a notice of appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals from an order of the Tax Commissioner denying an application for reassessment of a sales tax assessment and penalty theretofore made by the commissioner.

The board dismissed the appeal for the reason that the notice was not filed, as required by Section 5611, General Code, within 30 days after the final determination of the Tax Commissioner. The entry of the Board of Tax Appeals dismissing the appeal was dated April 6,1944.

On July 14,1944, appellant filed in this court a notice of appeal from the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals and thereafter the appellees filed a motion to dismiss for the reason that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal which was not taken within 30 days after the date of the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals.

Counsel for appellant contends that the Board of Tax Appeals did not give to appellant notice by registered mail of the entry of April 6, 1944, but admits that on May 14, 1944, notice of the action of the board was received by appellant and counsel.

*232 More than 30 days had elapsed before an appeal was perfected to this court.

Section 5611-2, General Code, authorizing appeals to this court, provides that “Such appeals shall.be taken within thirty days after the date of the entry of the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals on the journal of its proceedings * * Notice of appeal in the present proceeding not having been filed within the 30 days prescribed by that section, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Bell, Williams and Turner, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1951: 11967: 12003: 119512026peak 1951 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Davidson v. Keller224 N.E.2d 533 (Ohio Ct. App. 1967)
  2. Suchy v. Zaino, Unpublished Decision (10-3-2003)2003 Ohio 5270 (2003)
  3. Goldman v. L. B. Harrison156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 403 (1951)

Most recent

  1. Suchy v. Zaino, Unpublished Decision (10-3-2003)2003 Ohio 5270 (2003)
  2. Davidson v. Keller224 N.E.2d 533 (Ohio Ct. App. 1967)
  3. Goldman v. L. B. Harrison156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 403 (1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list