Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Kepner
The Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co., Appellant, v. Kepner, Appellee
Subsequent history: aff'd, Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. Kepner, 314 U.S. 44 (1941). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion of the Court
It appearing that the judges of the court are equally *207 divided in opinion as to the merits of this case and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment he affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Day, Williams and Hart, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.