TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Hile v. Zangerle

The State, Ex Rel. Hile, a Taxpayer, v. Zangerle, Aud., Et Al.

State ex rel. Hile v. Zangerle, 9 N.E.2d 292 (Ohio 1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 16, 1937
Docket
No. 26474
Judges
Weygandt, Jones, Matthias, Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers
Citations
9 N.E.2d 292132 Ohio St. 523132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 5238 Ohio Op. 4991937 Ohio LEXIS 206

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Relator, as a taxpayer, seeks a writ of mandamus from this court to compel the county auditor to levy a tax on all the property possessed or controlled by the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District.

The Tax Commission demurred to the petition on the ground of misjoinder of parties, and the relator in open court conceded that that demurrer should be sustained.

The Metropolitan Park District filed a separate answer.

The County Auditor and the Board of County Commissioners filed a joint answer, to which the relator interposed a demurrer.

A demurrer searches the entire record, and therefore in this case reaches the petition. 31 Ohio Jurisprudence, 781, Section 202;

Trott v. Sarchett, 10 Ohio St., 241 ;

State, ex rel. Hartford Life Ins. Co., v. Douds, 96 Ohio St., 604 , 118 N. E., 1086 ;

State, ex rel. Deal, v. In *524 dustrial Commission, 120 Ohio St., 269 , 166 N. E., 198 .

Mandamus is an extraordinary writ which will issue only when there is no other adequate remedy at law.

Section 5616, General Code, authorizes a taxpayer to file a complaint against an exemption of property from taxation and Section 5611-2, General Code, provides for appeal to the Court of Common Pleas.

The relator having another adequate remedy at law, a wjrit of mandamus will be denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Zimmerman, Williams and Myers, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1949: 11950: 11953: 11956: 11966: 11972: 119492026peak 1949 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Harp v. Cope United Methodist Home278 N.E.2d 349 (Ohio 1972)
  2. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of Berea218 N.E.2d 428 (Ohio 1966)
  3. Ross v. Cincinnati Transit Co.136 N.E.2d 760 (Ohio Ct. App. 1956)
  4. Galion v. Galion97 N.E.2d 68 (Ohio Ct. App. 1950)
  5. State, ex rel. Hepperla v. Glander114 N.E.2d 753 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949)
  6. State ex rel. Hepperla v. Glander160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 59 (1953)

Most recent

  1. Harp v. Cope United Methodist Home278 N.E.2d 349 (Ohio 1972)
  2. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of Berea218 N.E.2d 428 (Ohio 1966)
  3. Ross v. Cincinnati Transit Co.136 N.E.2d 760 (Ohio Ct. App. 1956)
  4. State ex rel. Hepperla v. Glander160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 59 (1953)
  5. Galion v. Galion97 N.E.2d 68 (Ohio Ct. App. 1950)
  6. State, ex rel. Hepperla v. Glander114 N.E.2d 753 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
State, ex rel. v. Indus. Comm., 166 N.E. 198 (Ohio 1929) 4
Armstrong v. Treasurer of Athens Cnty., 10 Ohio St. 235 (1840) 21

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list