TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lutz v. Evatt

Lutz, Appellant, v. Evatt, Tax Commr., Appellee

Lutz v. Evatt, 60 N.E.2d 473 (Ohio 1945)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 21, 1945
Docket
No. 30174
Judges
Weygandt, Zimmerman, Williams, Turner, Matthias, Hart
Citations
60 N.E.2d 473144 Ohio St. 635144 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63530 Ohio Op. 2231945 Ohio LEXIS 504

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The present appeal is related to the appeal disposed of in the case of Lutz v. Evatt, Tax Commr., ante, 341, where a statement of the facts pertinent to the instant case will be found.

In this appeal appellant complains of the entry of the Board of Tax Appeals, filed October 4, 1944, denying his motion asking the board to vacate its entry or decision of July 10, 1944, and to “re-file the same and notify him [thereof] by registered mail so that he might have the opportunity of appealing the same to the Supreme Court of Ohio as prescribed by law.”

*636 A majority of this court entertains the view (1) that the copy of the board’s entry of July 10, 1944, sent to appellant’s then attorney of record by registered mail on the following day, constituted notice to appellant within the intendment of Section 5611-1, General Code (American Export & Inland Coal Corp.

v. Matthew Addy Co., 112 Ohio St., 186 , 147 N. E., 89 ) and (2) that no appeal having been taken from the board’s entry or decision of July 10,1944, within thirty days from its filing as required by Section 5611-2, General Code, the board was without power or authority after the expiration of such thirty-day period to vacate such decision and refile it in order to confer the right of appeal contrary to the statute.

Industrial Commission v. Glenn, 101 Ohio St., 454 , 129 N. E., 687 . Compare 4 Corpus Juris Secundum, 929, Section 458.

Finding the decision of the board as contained in its entry of October 4, 1944, proper and lawful, the same is affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

Weygandt, C, J., Zimmerman, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1954: 11983: 11984: 11991: 22010: 119542026peak 1991 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. MB West Chester, L.L.C. v. Butler County Board of Revision2010 Ohio 3781
  2. State ex rel. Nicodemus v. Industrial Commission448 N.E.2d 1360 (Ohio 1983)
  3. Peoples National Bank v. Treon476 N.E.2d 372 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984)
  4. City of Centerville Board of Tax Appeals v. Wright594 N.E.2d 670 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991)
  5. Danny Eidi v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.931 F.2d 893 (6th Cir. 1991)
  6. Raible v. Raydel162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 25 (1954)

Most recent

  1. MB West Chester, L.L.C. v. Butler County Board of Revision2010 Ohio 3781
  2. Danny Eidi v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.931 F.2d 893 (6th Cir. 1991)
  3. City of Centerville Board of Tax Appeals v. Wright594 N.E.2d 670 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991)
  4. Peoples National Bank v. Treon476 N.E.2d 372 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984)
  5. State ex rel. Nicodemus v. Industrial Commission448 N.E.2d 1360 (Ohio 1983)
  6. Raible v. Raydel162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 25 (1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Am. Export & Inland Coal Corp. v. Matthew Addy Co., 147 N.E. 89 (Ohio 1925) 30

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list