TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Borman's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

BORMAN’S, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent

Borman's, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 676 F.2d 1138 (6th Cir. 1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 3, 1982
Docket
No. 81-1165
Judges
Engel, Contie, Cecil
Citations
676 F.2d 1138110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 27961982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19588

Opinion

ORDER This matter is before the court on cross-petitions for review and enforcement, respectively, of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board reported at 254 NLRB No. 130 . The order under review required petitioner to post notices acknowledging that it would not restrain or coerce its employees by forbidding them to advertise a grievance by “wearing a shirt with the slogan ‘I’m tired of bustin’ my ass’ ”. The order further requires respondent to promise it would not threaten employees with discipline if such activity was continued, and further directed them to expunge from the personnel records of two employees a memo which had been placed therein with respect to such conduct. Upon a review of the record as a whole, the court is of the opinion that the employer conduct complained of was isolated and that no substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that the wearing of the T-shirt constituted the exercise of any right protected under the National Labor Relations Act. The employer was therefore not in violation of the Act in restricting the display of the above-described slogan by employees on its premises during working hours.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that enforcement of the described order is DENIED.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1983: 21990: 11992: 11996: 119832026peak 1983 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list