TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Adair Realty & Trust Co. v. Harnage

ADAIR REALTY & TRUST CO. v. HARNAGE, County Treas.

Adair Realty & Trust Co. v. Harnage, 1931 OK 24, 296 P. 201
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 3, 1931
Docket
No. 21558
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
296 P. 2011931 OK 24147 Okla. 1791931 Okla. LEXIS 741

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Muskogee county, rendered on the 30th day of January, 1930, in an action wherein the plaintiff in error was plaintiff. The motion for new trial was overruled February 1, 3930, and the time in which to serve case-made was extended 60 days from that date. On April 1, 1930, by order of the court, the time to serve case-made- was extended 60 days from that date. On May 30, 1930. the time in which to serve case-made was by order of the court extended 30 days from date. No further orders extending such time were made.

The ease-made was served upon the defendant in error on June 30, 1930. and the certificate of the trial judge recites tliac, “Upon examination of the said case-made I find that same has been duly prepared and served' upon the defendant herein within the time allowed by law and by the orders of this court.”

The time in which to serve the case-made as extended by order of the court of May 30, 1930, expired on June 29, 1930. The case-made served June 30, 1930, was not served within the time allowed by law or a valid order of the court, is a nullity, and brings nothing before this court for review. Shinn v. Oklahoma City Building & Loan Ass’n, 130 Okla. 173 , 266 Pac. 435 ; Petty v. Foster, 122 Okla. 153 , 252 Pac. 836 ; Harrison v. Reed, 81 Okla. 149 , 197 Pac. 159 .

The purported record presented clearly shows the recital in the certificate of the trial judge, ¡(hat the case-made had been duly served within the time allowed by law and the order of the court, is erroneous, and in such case the record will control. Town v. Crawford, 106 Okla. 254 . 234 Pac. 208 .

For the reason there is nothing before this court for review, the appeal is dismissed.

Note. — See under (1) anno. 42 L. R. A. (N. S.) 623; 2 R. C. L. p. 159; R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 352.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Harrison v. Reed, 1921 OK 67, 197 P. 159 18
Shinn v. Okla. City Bldg. & Loan Ass'n, 1928 OK 105, 266 P. 435 11
Town v. Crawford, 1925 OK 164, 234 P. 208 10
Petty v. Foster, 1927 OK 16, 252 P. 836 21
Apple v. Hert, 1927 OK 12, 252 P. 823 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list