TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Assessment of Chickasha Milling Co.

In re Assessment of Chickasha Milling Co., 1920 OK 341, 194 P. 217
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 9, 1920
Docket
No. 10641
Judges
Higgins, Rainey, Harrison, Pitchford, Johnson, Meneill, Collier
Citations
194 P. 2171920 OK 34180 Okla. 1021920 Okla. LEXIS 168
Disposition
Reversed and remanded.
Summary
Error from District Court, Grady» County; Will Linn, Judge. Action to, determine the valuation of corporate property of the Chickasha Milling Company for taxation purposes.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Higgins

HIGGINS, J.

'This is a companion case to In re Assessment of Chickasha Cotton Oil *103 Company, this day rendered. The two eases have been consolidated in this court and the facts and law applicable to the facts are similar in each case. The case is reversed and remanded for the reason set forth in the opinion in the above case.

Reversed and remanded.

RAINEY, C. J., HARRISON, Y. C. J., and PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, MeNEILL, and COLLIER, JJ„ concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1922: 11924: 11926: 119222026peak 1922 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list